Start My Answer

Fruit of the Poisonous Tree

Chloe Meltzer | October 19, 2022

Legal Expert
Chloe Meltzer, MA

Chloe Meltzer is an experienced content writer specializing in legal content creation. She holds a degree in English Literature from Arizona State University, complemented by a Master’s in Marketing from California Polytechnic State University-San Luis Obispo.

Edited by Hannah Locklear

Hannah Locklear
Editor at SoloSuit
Hannah Locklear, BA

Hannah Locklear is SoloSuit’s Marketing and Impact Manager. With an educational background in Linguistics, Spanish, and International Development from Brigham Young University, Hannah has also worked as a legal support specialist for several years.

What most people think when they hear "fruit of the poisonous tree" ^^

Summary: Fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine protects people in criminal cases from having illegally-obtained evidence used against them in court. Here is SoloSuit's guide on fruit of the poisonous tree.

If you're involved in a court case, and you hear people talking about the “fruit of the poisonous tree,” you might be wondering if you just stepped into a Snow White fairytale. But fruit of the poisonous tree is just a fancy legal term used to describe the following.

In most court cases, the prosecution cannot use evidence that is obtained illegally. This rule is known as the fruit of the poisonous tree. It is an extension of the exclusionary rule, which prohibits evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment from being admitted in criminal trial proceedings. However, there are a few main exceptions to the doctrine.

Here's everything you need to know about the Fourth Amendment, how fruit of the poisonous tree works, and exceptions to the exclusionary rule.

Let's jump right in.

Understanding the Fourth Amendment

The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. The Constitution is part of the Bill of Rights. This amendment is a guard against unreasonable searches and seizures. It also states that all people have the right to security in their persons, houses, papers, and effects.. Additionally, it states that no warrants shall be issued without probable cause.

What is the doctrine, fruit of the poisonous tree?

This doctrine is a law that makes evidence that was derived from an illegal search, arrest, or interrogation unusable in court. Essentially, it is when evidence was obtained in a manner that violates Also known as the Derivative Evidence Doctrine, the evidence is referred to as the “fruit” and was essentially tainted because it was obtained by illegal means, which is considered the “poisonous tree.”

This rule was originally established in 1920 by the decision in Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. the United States. Later, the phrase "fruit of the poisonous tree" was coined by Justice Frankfurter in his 1939 opinion in Nardone v. the United States. In the doctrine, all illegally obtained evidence must be excluded from being submitted as evidence. However, all evidence obtained or derived from the exploitation of that evidence is also illegal to use. If it is submitted, the courts would consider the evidence as “tainted fruit of the poison tree”.

Three exceptions to the exclusionary cause

There are three main exceptions to the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine. The evidence will not be excluded if:

  1. It was discovered from an independent source: If the source was fully independent of the illegal activity, it is admissible.
  2. Its discovery was inevitable: When the prosecution can demonstrate that law enforcement would have found the evidence regardless of if they acted unconstitutionally, then the evidence will be admissible.
  3. There was an intervening act of free will: This will break the chain of evidence from the original illegal search. For example, if a defendant was released on his or her own recognizance after an illegal arrest, and then went to the station to confess.

The fourth exception

There is also an exception called the good-faith exception when it comes to the exclusionary rule. If officers are able to illegally obtain the primary evidence in a case that involves the fruit of the poisonous tree, but it was a good-faith exception, then that evidence can be used in court.

The good-faith exception is specific in that if officers who performed a search did so believing they were following the law, and a seizure took place, then the evidence obtained is admissible in court.

For example, if there was a defective search warrant based on no probable cause, but the officer was operating in their own good faith because the judge signed the warrant, then the evidence would not be excluded. For someone in the defendant's chair, this may not seem fair, but it is an exception.

Examples where the fruit of the poisonous tree applies

Unlawful search

In one case involving a man named Carl Smith, there was a ledger book that was seized from him indicating his involvement in drug transactions. It was rendered inadmissible against him at trial and was subject to suppression. In this case, if police used the information contained in the ledger to obtain search warrants to search the homes of the buyers listed, all of the evidence obtained from those searches were not admissible against Carl Smith.

Another example would be if you were to call 911 regarding a domestic issue. If an officer arrives and you invite them into your home where they decide to search your home for drugs and find cocaine on the dining table, you might think this would be an illegal search. However, even though the search was done without a warrant, the officer was invited in, and the drugs were in plain sight.

Alternatively, if a cop finds a gun under the seat of your car, but has no reason to pull you over and search your car, then the search would be deemed illegal. Most times, the gun would also not be admissible in court. The illegal search would be considered the poisonous tree, and the gun is considered the fruit.

Illegal wiretap

If the police begin to listen in on and record the statements of suspected drug dealers but do not get a warrant first this could lead to the doctrine being enacted. If the dealers say that he left some cocaine in an abandoned warehouse for the buyer to pick up, and this leads to the police finding the drugs, it may end up being inadmissible. The illegally recorded statement would be the poisonous tree, while the drugs that the officers found would be the fruit.

Pros and cons of the fruit of the poison tree

Fruit of the poisonous tree can be a positive for those who have been charged with crimes due to accidental or illegal evidence found. However, this can be a serious issue for law enforcement or the courts. Often it could even be seen as something that would prevent evidence from being admitted.

Even though the fruit of the poisonous tree doesn't really apply in civil cases, like debt lawsuits, there are still many ways that debt collectors can break the law and make their evidence invalid. SoloSuit can help you learn more about unfair debt collection practices and how to protect yourself from abusive debt collectors.

What is SoloSuit?

SoloSuit makes it easy to fight debt collectors.

You can use SoloSuit to respond to a debt lawsuit, to send letters to collectors, and even to settle a debt.

SoloSuit's Answer service is a step-by-step web-app that asks you all the necessary questions to complete your Answer. Upon completion, we'll have an attorney review your document and we'll file it for you.

Respond with SoloSuit

"First time getting sued by a debt collector and I was searching all over YouTube and ran across SoloSuit, so I decided to buy their services with their attorney reviewed documentation which cost extra but it was well worth it! SoloSuit sent the documentation to the parties and to the court which saved me time from having to go to court and in a few weeks the case got dismissed!" – James

Get Started

We have answers.
Join our community of over 40,000 people.

You can ask your questions on the SoloSuit forum and the community will help you out. Whether you need help now or are just looking for support, we're here for you.

Ask a Question

>>Read the FastCompany article: Debt Lawsuits Are Complicated: This Website Makes Them Simpler To Navigate

>>Read the NPR story on SoloSuit. (We can help you in all 50 states.)

How to answer a summons for debt collection in your state

Here's a list of guides for other states.

All 50 states.

Guides on how to beat every debt collector

Being sued by a different debt collector? Were making guides on how to beat each one.

Win against credit card companies

Is your credit card company suing you? Learn how you can beat each one.

Going to Court for Credit Card Debt — Key Tips

How to Negotiate Credit Card Debts

How to Settle a Credit Card Debt Lawsuit — Ultimate Guide

Get answers to these FAQs

Need more info on statutes of limitations? Read our 50-state guide.

Why do debt collectors block their phone numbers?

How long do debt collectors take to respond to debt validation letters?

What are the biggest debt collector companies in the US?

Is Zombie Debt Still a Problem in 2019?

SoloSuit FAQ

If a car is repossessed, do I still owe the debt?

Is Portfolio Recovery Associates Legit?

Is There a Judgment Against Me Without my Knowledge?

Should I File Bankruptcy Before or After a Judgment?

What is a default judgment?— What do I do?

Summoned to Court for Medical Bills — What Do I Do?

What Happens If Someone Sues You and You Have No Money?

What Happens If You Never Answer Debt Collectors?

What Happens When a Debt Is Sold to a Collection Agency

What is a Stipulated Judgment?

What is the Deadline for a Defendants Answer to Avoid a Default Judgment?

Can a Judgement Creditor Take my Car?

Can I Settle a Debt After Being Served?

Can I Stop Wage Garnishment?

Can You Appeal a Default Judgement?

Do I Need a Debt Collection Defense Attorney?

Do I Need a Payday Loans Lawyer?

Do student loans go away after 7 years? — Student Loan Debt Guide

Am I Responsible for My Spouses Medical Debt?

Should I Marry Someone With Debt?

Can a Debt Collector Leave a Voicemail?

How Does Debt Assignment Work?

What Happens If a Defendant Does Not Pay a Judgment?

How Does Debt Assignment Work?

Can You Serve Someone with a Collections Lawsuit at Their Work?

What Is a Warrant in Debt?

How Many Times Can a Judgment be Renewed in Oklahoma?

Can an Eviction Be Reversed?

Does Debt Consolidation Have Risks?

What Happens If You Avoid Getting Served Court Papers?

Does Student Debt Die With You?

Can Debt Collectors Call You at Work in Texas?

How Much Do You Have to Be in Debt to File for Chapter 7?

What Is the Statute of Limitations on Debt in Washington?

How Long Does a Judgment Last?

Can Private Disability Payments Be Garnished?

Can Debt Collectors Call From Local Numbers?

Does the Fair Credit Reporting Act Work in Florida?

The Truth: Should You Never Pay a Debt Collection Agency?

Should You Communicate with a Debt Collector in Writing or by Telephone?

Do I Need a Debt Negotiator?

What Happens After a Motion for Default Is Filed?

Can a Process Server Leave a Summons Taped to My Door?

Learn More With These Additional Resources:

Need help managing your finances? Check out these resources.

How to Make a Debt Validation Letter - The Ultimate Guide

How to Make a Motion to Compel Arbitration Without an Attorney

How to Stop Wage Garnishment — Everything You Need to Know

How to File an FDCPA Complaint Against Your Debt Collector (Ultimate Guide)

Defending Yourself in Court Against a Debt Collector

Tips on you can to file an FDCPA lawsuit against a debt collection agency

Advice on how to answer a summons for debt collection.

Effective strategies for how to get back on track after a debt lawsuit

New Hampshire Statute of Limitations on Debt

Sample Cease and Desist Letter Against Debt Collectors

The Ultimate Guide to Responding to a Debt Collection Lawsuit in Utah

West Virginia Statute of Limitations on Debt

What debt collectors cannot do — FDCPA explained

Defending Yourself in Court Against Debt Collector

How to Liquidate Debt

Arkansas Statute of Limitations on Debt

Youre Drowning in Debt — Heres How to Swim

Help! Im Being Sued by My Debt Collector

How to Make a Motion to Vacate Judgment

How to Answer Summons for Debt Collection in Vermont

North Dakota Statute of Limitations on Debt

ClearPoint Debt Management Review

Indiana Statute of Limitations on Debt

Oregon Eviction Laws - What They Say

CuraDebt Debt Settlement Review

How to Write a Re-Aging Debt Letter

How to Appear in Court by Phone

How to Use the Doctrine of Unclean Hands

Debt Consolidation in Eugene, Oregon

Summoned to Court for Medical Bills? What to Do Next

How to Make a Debt Settlement Agreement

Received a 3-Day Eviction Notice? Heres What to Do

How to Answer a Lawsuit for Debt Collection

Tips for Leaving the Country With Unpaid Credit Card Debt

Kansas Statute of Limitations on Debt Collection

How to File in Small Claims Court in Iowa

How to File a Civil Answer in Kings County Supreme Court

Roseland Associates Debt Consolidation Review

How to Stop a Garnishment

Debt Eraser Review

Do Debt Collectors Ever Give Up?

Can They Garnish Your Wages for Credit Card Debt?

How Often Do Credit Card Companies Sue for Non-Payment?

How Long Does a Judgement Last?

​​How Long Before a Creditor Can Garnish Wages?

How to Beat a Bill Collector in Court